No
peace, No peace plans, No price for Peace
(A short guide to those obsessed with peace)
Moshe Sharon
Everybody says
that his donkey is a horse.
There is no tax
on words.
(Two Arab proverbs)
On December 24th 1977, at the very beginning
of the negotiations between Israel and Egypt in Ismailia, I had the
opportunity to have a short discussion with Muhammad Anwar Sadat the
president of Egypt. "Tell your Prime Minister," he said, "that this is
a bazaar; the merchandise is expensive." I told my Prime Minister but
he failed to abide by the rules of the bazaar. The failure was not
unique to him alone. It is the failure of all the Israeli governments
and the media.
On March 4, 1994, I
published an article in the Jerusalem Post called "Novices in
Negotiations" The occasion was the conclusion of the "Cairo Agreement."
A short time later, Yasser Arafat, proved yet again that his signature
was not worth the ink of his pen let alone the paper to which it was
affixed, and his word was worth even less. Then, as in every subsequent
agreement Israel was taken aback when her concessions had become the
basis for fresh Arab demands.
In Middle Eastern
bazaar diplomacy, agreements are kept not because they are signed but
because they are imposed. Besides, in the bazaar of the Arab-Israeli
conflict, the two sides are not discussing the same merchandise. The
Israelis wish to acquire peace based on the Arab-Muslim acceptance of
Israel as a Jewish state. The objective of the Arabs is to annihilate
the Jewish state, replace it with an Arab state, and get rid of the
Jews.
To achieve their
goal, the Arabs took to the battlefield and to the bazaar diplomacy.
The most important rule in the bazaar is that if the vendor knows that
you desire to purchase a certain piece of merchandize, he will raise
its price. The merchandise in question is "peace" and the Arabs give
the impression that they actually have this merchandise and inflate its
price, when in truth they do not have it at all.
This is the wisdom
of the bazaar, if you are clever enough you can sell nothing at a
price. The Arabs sell words, they sign agreements, and they trade with
vague promises, but are sure to receive generous down payments from
eager buyers. In the bazaar only a foolish buyer pays for something he
has never seen.
There is another
rule in the market as well as across the negotiating table: the side
that first presents his terms is bound to loose; the other side builds
his next move using the open cards of his opponent as the starting
point.
In all its
negotiations with the Palestinian Arabs, Israel has always rushed to
offer its plans, and was surprised to discover that after an agreement
had been "concluded" it had become the basis for further demands.
Most amazing is the
reaction in such cases. Israeli politicians, "experts" and the media
eagerly provide "explanations" for the Arabs' behaviour. One of the
most popular explanations is that these or other Arab pronouncements
are "for internal use," as if "internal use" does not count. Other
explanations invoke "the Arab sensitivity to symbols," "honour,"
"matters of emotion" and other more patronising sayings of this nature.
Does Israel possess no "sensitivities" or does it have no honour? What
does all this have to do with political encounters?
It is therefore
essential, as the late President Sadat advised, to learn the rules of
the oriental bazaar before venturing into the arena of bazaar
diplomacy. The most important of all the rules is the Roman saying: "If
you want peace -- prepare for war." Never come to the negotiating table
from a position of weakness. Your adversary should always know that you
are strong and ready for war even more than you are ready for peace.
In the present
situation in the Middle East and in the foreseeable future "peace" is
nothing more than an empty word. Israel should stop speaking about
"peace" and delete the word "peace" from its vocabulary together with
such phrases as "the price of peace" or "territory for peace." For a
hundred years the Jews have been begging the Arabs to sell them peace,
ready to pay any price. They have received nothing, because the Arabs
have no peace to sell, but they have still paid dearly. It must be said
in all fairness that the Arabs have not made a secret of the fact that
what they meant by the word "peace" was nothing more than a limited
ceasefire for a limited period.
Since this is the
situation, Israel should openly declare that peace does not exist as an
option in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and that it has decided to create
a new state of affairs in the Middle East, compelling the Arab side to
ask for peace; and pay for it. Unlike
the Arabs, Israel has this merchandize for sale.
From now on Israel
should be the side demanding payment for peace. If the Arabs want
peace, Israel should fix its price in real terms. The Arabs will pay if
they reach the conclusion that Israel is so strong that they cannot
destroy it. Because of this, Israel’s deterrent power is essential.
Therefore, if anyone
asks Israel for plans, the answer should be: no "plans," no
"suggestions," no "constructive ideas," in fact no negotiations at all.
If the Arab side wants to negotiate, let it present its plans and its
"ideas." If and when it does, the first Israeli reaction should always
be "unacceptable! Come with better ones." If and when the time comes
for serious negotiations, once the Arabs have lost all hope of
annihilating the Jewish state, here are ten rules for bargaining in the
Middle Eastern bazaar:
The Arabs have been
practising negotiation tactics for more than 2000 years. They are the
masters of words, and a mine of endless patience. In contrast, Israelis
(and Westerners in general) want quick "results." In this part of the
world there are no quick results, the hasty one always loses.
Moshe Sharon is Professor of Islamic History at the Hebrew University